Übersicht			Auf mobile öffnen

Lieferstatus:	i.d.R. innert 14-24 Tagen versandfertig
Veröffentlichung:	August 2009
Genre:	Philosophie
	1500 bis heute / Epistemologie / Epistemologie und Erkenntnistheorie / Erkenntnis; Moral; Recht; Hegel; Honneth / Erkenntnistheorie / Ethik / Ethik / Sozialethik / Ethik und Moralphilosophie / Ethos / Moderne Philosophie# nach 1800 / Moralphilosophie / Philosophie / Erkenntnis / Philosophie / Ethik / Philosophie / Gesellschaft, Politik, Staat / Philosophie / Moralphilosophie / Philosophie / Philosophiegeschichte / Selbst... - Das Selbst / Soziale und politische Philosophie / Sozialethik
ISBN:	9783110219876
EAN-Code:	9783110219876
Verlag:	De Gruyter
Einband:	Gebunden
Sprache:	English
Serie:	#91 - Quellen und Studien zur Philosophie
Dimensionen:	H 236 mm / B 160 mm / D 20 mm
Gewicht:	547 gr
Seiten:	260
Zus. Info:	HC runder Rücken kaschiert
Bewertung:	Titel bewerten / Meinung schreiben

Inhalt:

In the contemporary (practical) philosophy, recognition is one of the central concepts. Humans are thematized as individuals who recognize one another as moral and legal persons. The central problem of the globalized, multicultural societies is how to harmonize the legal persons (who are free and equal) with moral persons (who may have their unique identity). In The Nature of the Self the thesis is elaborated that, in the contemporary discussion, a central dimension of recognition is lacking. All forms of moral and legal recognition presuppose the recognition at a more fundamental level: the recognition of the body by the mind. The systematic development of this relation can be performed with the help of a critical reconstruction of Hegel 's project in the Phenomenology of Spirit and the Philosophy of Right. This reconstruction results in a differentiated concept of the self: in three forms of the self (corresponding with three forms of recognition) and their institutional embodiment. This concept of the self not only competes with the position of Jürgen Habermas and Axel Honneth (as it is explicitly elaborated), but also with the one of John Rawls.